Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0371420211000010018
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2021 Volume.100 No. 1 p.18 ~ p.24
Comparing the surgical outcomes of dual-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and three-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Ahn Hye-Seong

Chang Mee-Soo
Han Dong-Seok
Abstract
Purpose: Many studies have demonstrated that single-incision or reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is a feasible method compared to conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Using rigid-type laparoscope and right-side approach, we could perform dual-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (DPLDG) for gastric cancer. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of DPLDG to those of 3-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TPLDG).

Methods: From March 2017 to December 2019, this retrospective study included 218 patients with gastric cancer who underwent DPLDG (106 patients) or TPLDG (112 patients) at SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center. Surgical outcomes were compared between 2 operation methods.

Results: Operation time was similar between DPLDG and TPLDG (158.9 ¡¾ 33.4 minutes vs. 154.0 ¡¾ 31.1 min, P = 0.787). The number of retrieved lymph nodes was similar between the 2 groups (35.3 ¡¾ 14.6 vs. 37.0 ¡¾ 13.5, P = 0.415). The complication rate in DPLDG and TPLDG groups was 10.4% and 8.9%, respectively (P = 0.894). The time to first flatus, time to first diet, and postoperative hospital stay were similar between the 2 groups. There were no reoperation or mortality cases. The cost of trocars was 359.9 US dollars (USD) in DPLDG and 291?391.4 USD in TPLDG.

Conclusion: The surgical outcomes of DPLDG and TPLDG did not differ. Regarding fewer incisions, DPLDG can be an alternative option for TPLDG.
KEYWORD
Laparoscopy, Reduced port, Stomach neoplasms
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
SCI(E) ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø